Press Release
For Immediate Release
May 19, 2026
Contact:
Jennifer Rose
Press Secretary, Office of Mayor Paul K.
Pernerewski, Jr.
Email: Jrose@waterburyct.org
Mayor Paul
Pernerewski Statement Regarding PCB Contamination Remediation Vote
(WATERBURY, CT) For weeks, the City of Waterbury and the Waterbury Development
Corporation have been working to address a serious environmental contamination
issue discovered at the Mad River Redevelopment Corridor site located at 777
South Main Street.
During remediation activities, a previously unidentified
10,000-gallon underground storage tank containing PCB-contaminated oily water
and sludge, along with surrounding soil contamination measuring approximately
2,200 parts per million, was discovered adjacent to the banks of the Mad River
by contractors.
This is a serious environmental and public health matter
involving carcinogenic contaminants regulated under federal law through the
Toxic Substances Control Act.
Environmental professionals, engineers, remediation experts,
and state officials all recognized the urgency of this situation. The
Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development approved
additional funding to remove the tank and continue remediation work. On May 11,
2026, the Waterbury Development Corporation brought forward the necessary
contract amendment before the Board of Aldermen to allow this dangerous
material to be safely removed before further contamination could occur.
Yet despite the documented environmental and public health
risks, and despite a majority of aldermen voting in favor of the remediation
effort, the amendment failed because it did not receive the 11 affirmative
votes required for passage.
Most troubling is that three of the aldermen who voted no
represent the very district where this contamination exists.
Following the Board s failure to approve the amendment, the
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection issued a
violation notice. That notice included potential enforcement penalties of up to
$25,000 per day should the city fail to take corrective action, creating an
even greater urgency to act before the existing remediation contract expired.
Because the Board s regular meeting schedule would not allow
the matter to wait until the next scheduled meeting, I called for a special
meeting to take place on May 18, 2026, to prevent further delays and allow the
city to move forward with remediation efforts.
During that special meeting, members of the minority caucus
openly connected the original failed vote to political grievances regarding
Board procedures and internal political disputes, rather than the merits of the
environmental remediation itself.
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann stated:
'We have asked, we have begged, we have pleaded for our rules to be changed...
That s what s going on here, that s why you didn t receive the 11 votes,
because we have no respect, we feel that there isn t respect being put towards
the process.'
When questioned further during the meeting, Alderwoman
Zimmermann stated:
'It's not to keep a contaminate in the ground or anything like that.'
Board President Michael DiGiovancarlo then directly questioned
whether the minority caucus was "going to basically hijack every vote and not
do what s good for the City of Waterbury s residents because you're mad because
your rules didn't get voted in."
In response, Alderwoman Zimmermann stated:
'You guys have not come to the table for compromising on anything. So why would
we not respect the process? You don't want to respect the process at all.'
She later added:
'Why are we having it on the record to get me to say that I'm hijacking the
rules and hijacking contaminates in the ground to be on the record so it can be
in the newspaper above the fold tomorrow because, no that's not the purpose.'
The residents of Waterbury should be deeply troubled that
political disputes and procedural grievances became intertwined with a matter
involving dangerous environmental contamination and public health.
At the May 18 special meeting, the amendment ultimately passed
unanimously among those present. Notably absent, however, were Aldermen Rafael
Feliciano-Roman, Adrian Sanchez, and Sandra Martinez-McCarthy, the very
aldermen representing the district where this contamination issue is located
and who had previously voted to reject the clean-up.
Residents deserve to ask why elected officials who represent
the impacted neighborhood were absent during one of the most significant
environmental public safety votes affecting their constituents.
Because of the initial failed vote, the city was placed in a
position where state intervention became necessary and emergency action had to
be taken to avoid additional environmental exposure, liability, delays, fines
and escalating remediation costs.
This administration will not stop fighting to protect the
health and safety of Waterbury residents. We will continue working with state
and federal environmental agencies to ensure this contamination is addressed
responsibly, lawfully, and without unnecessary political interference.
The residents of Waterbury deserve leadership focused on
protecting neighborhoods, safeguarding public health, and doing what is right
for the community, not using an environmental crisis as leverage in political
disputes."
Roll Call
Vote: May 11, 2026 Board of Aldermen Meeting
Item #13: Amendment #1 to Construction Contract for
Environmental Waste Remediation at 359 Mill Street and 777 South Main Street
YES Votes (9):
Ian Blake, Ken Curran, John Drewry, Jeff Hunter, Sean Mosley, George Noujaim,
Mike Rinaldi, Belinda Weaver, Michael DiGiovancarlo
NO Votes (6):
Rafael Feliciano-Roman, Mike Grosso, Bryan McEntee, Sandra Martinez-McCarthy,
Adrian Sanchez, Kelly Zimmermann
The amendment failed because 11 affirmative votes were
required for passage.
Three of the six NO votes were cast by aldermen representing
Waterbury s 5th District, the district in which the contamination site is
located.
Appendix A:
Transcript Excerpt from May 18, 2026 Special Meeting of the Board of Aldermen
The following transcript excerpt reflects discussion during
the May 18, 2026 special meeting regarding the failed May 11 remediation vote
and subsequent emergency action required to address the PCB contamination
remediation project.
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann:
"We have asked, we have begged, we have pleaded for our rules to be changed. So
we have committee meetings. Every single person outside of the two minority
caucuses, voted to not change the rules. The rules were to follow the charter
and, the rules that we wanted to progress with was to follow the charter and to
have the right of passage for each item and give it its respect for its right
of passage to go to the following meeting. That's what's going on here, that's
why you didn't receive the 11 votes because we have no respect, we feel that
there isn't respect being put towards the process."
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann:
"Mr. Nardozzi, how did the State come to find the, how did these fines again
can you repeat how these fines came up and how the state, mind you this was all
on public record that we had the tank in the ground and this isn't towards you,
that we had the tank in the ground and all these other things that now we're
being punished for. Can you go through the process again of why we're being
fined? And was it because of timing, could we have done this sooner so that way
it would've had it's right way of passage. And I know your team is working hard
I know that there's a lot of projects going on. But I don t think that everyone
here within this body understand why you get the no's on the 11 threshold. And
why now we receive this fine. It's not to keep a contaminate in the ground or
anything like that. Can you please repeat."
Dr. James Nardozzi:
"I m a little confused by your question, on the 11 votes and that issue?"
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann:
"No can you please repeat why we were fined."
Dr. James Nardozzi:
"Well we have not been fined, I'm sorry we have not been fined. We have been
noticed that we will be fined if we fail to take action."
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann:
"Okay thank you."
Board President Michael DiGiovancarlo:
"And just for the record, Alderwoman Zimmerman so you're saying that since your
rules were not voted in, you're going to basically hijack every vote and not do
what s good for the City of Waterbury s residents because you're mad because your
rules didn't get voted in. Because that's what you stated just before you asked
Dr. Nardozzi a question. Am I clear to understand that's what you guys are going
to do, you're going to stonewall any good vote because you're mad about rules
not getting approved that rules were voted on the proper way in January. Just
so I'm clear now."
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann:
"It's not a proper way or not Mr. President, you guys have not come to the
table for compromising on anything. So why would we not respect the process?
You don t want to respect the process at all."
Board President Michael DiGiovancarlo:
"At what point do we not compromise by the way?"
Minority Leader Kelly Zimmermann:
"And I don t understand why we're going back and forth right now because I
don't even know if that s Roberts Rules of Order but. So why are we having it
on the record to get me to say that I'm hijacking the rules and hijacking
contaminates in the ground to be on the record so it can be in the newspaper
above the fold tomorrow because no that's not the purpose."
Above Exchange Time Stamp: 15:45 19:15
https://www.youtube.com/live/SmlL2x6RL2s?si=6eSarMiYoqlQ6wZv
Attached to this
release are supporting materials, including an aerial site map identifying the
precise location of the discovered underground storage tank adjacent to the
bank of the Mad River, as well as the Connecticut Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection Notice of Violation issued in connection with this
matter.
Relevant Links
Notice of Violation from CT DEEP RE South End Site
Map Showing Location of Discovered Tank Adjacent to Mad River